Build a target list of studios, titles, versions and jurisdictions before comparing catalogue totals. Aggregators should be compared on the content actually available to your operator and the operational work the service handles.

Review wallet integration, game launch and interruption handling, reporting and release changes. Establish who writes and validates the integration, how content incidents are escalated, and whether promotional tools are included or optional. The number of studios alone does not describe integration quality.

What to compare

Product role

What job does this product perform, and which adjacent jobs need another product?

Delivery and integration

How is it connected, what data or interfaces are required, and who owns implementation?

Pricing and packaging

Which recurring, usage, setup and add-on charges are included in the proposal?

Scope and coverage

Which markets, inputs, content or use cases are actually in the proposed scope?

Content formats

Which game formats and studios are available in the intended market?

Integration

What common interface connects the operator to the content?

Implementation owner

Who develops, validates and maintains the connection?

Buyer questions, answered

How is aggregation different from a game studio?

An aggregator connects multiple suppliers. A studio primarily supplies its own content, even if both use an API.

Does one integration give rights to every game?

No. Title access, versions and permitted markets still depend on the agreed content scope.

What belongs in an integration acceptance test?

Game launch, wallet transactions, interrupted sessions, reporting reconciliation and incident handling should have agreed tests.