Sardine

Identity-fraud signals and configurable AML transaction investigations.

Popularity76%Estimated · medium confidence
Explore 2 products

Explore the offering

Products & services

Separate profiles. Specific capabilities.

Open a product to explore its capabilities, delivery and sources, or browse its type to compare alternatives.

About Sardine

Sardine combines device, behaviour, identity and transaction signals in a risk platform. Its official financial-services material explicitly includes online gaming and gambling. The reviewed jobs are Identity Fraud, for risk-based onboarding and linked-account investigation, and AML Transaction Monitoring, for configurable transaction scenarios, counterparties and investigation records.

The platform’s rules, graph and AI-assisted workflows require a buyer’s data model, risk policy and oversight. Signals or generated investigation summaries are not proof that a person committed fraud or laundering, and a case narrative is not a submitted regulatory report. Sardine’s enterprise-customer aggregate covers its broader business; dataset businesses, profiled devices and screened transactions use different units.

Where this supplier fits

Gambling risk and compliance teams joining identity/device signals with transaction monitoring and investigation.

Company-level capabilities

  • Identity and device-risk signals
  • Progressive verification workflows
  • Linked-account and graph context
  • Configurable AML scenarios
  • Backtesting and threshold tuning
  • AI-assisted case summaries and oversight

These reflect the supplier's public descriptions. Check individual products for scope; a company capability does not automatically apply to every offering.

Questions for your evaluation

Use these to confirm the details for your business and market.

  1. Which events and identifiers are needed to link accounts, devices and money flows?
  2. Which rules and escalation policies will our team own?
  3. How are generated summaries reviewed, corrected and separated from regulatory submissions?

Commercial-reach estimate

Sardine popularity

76/100

An estimated index of documented commercial footprint and geographic reach. It is not market share, customer satisfaction or a product recommendation.

Medium evidence confidence80% of weighted inputs documentedChecked 9 Oct 2026
Commercial footprint 80% weight450+ enterprise customers

The current About page states 450+ Enterprise customers.

Scope: Sardine enterprise customers across banks, fintechs, marketplaces and merchants, covering the broader risk platform. It is not gambling-only adoption or a count of businesses in its datasets.

View source
Geographic reach 20% weightNot publicly confirmed

No numerical customer-linked country aggregate was established in the reviewed current official material.

Scope: Customer-linked geographic activity. Payment rails, document/data coverage, office locations, approvals and available markets are not inferred to be countries with customer operations.

View source

Source review confirms the recorded declaration, not an independent audit of every customer. Brands, customer groups and merchants are different units. Employee and follower counts do not affect this score.

Sardine enterprise customers across banks, fintechs, marketplaces and merchants, covering the broader risk platform. It is not gambling-only adoption or a count of businesses in its datasets. Missing inputs and undated reporting dates remain null. Workforce is context only.

Popularity methodology

Buyer questions, answered

Is gambling an explicit supplier use case?

Yes. Sardine’s official financial-services article names online gaming/gambling among high-risk industries served for fraud and compliance jobs. Current product pages describe the reviewed identity and transaction-monitoring capabilities.

Source
Does a network relationship prove wrongdoing?

No. Sardine’s graph and device/identity context expose related accounts and activity for investigation. The buyer’s reviewers need to assess the underlying evidence and decision policy.

Source
Does AML monitoring automatically file a regulatory report?

The product describes configurable monitoring, investigations and case records. The operator must review the evidence, make reporting decisions and establish its authorised filing process separately.

Source