IPQualityScore

Proxy, VPN and IP-risk evidence for casino account and location review.

Popularity85%Estimated · medium confidence
Explore 1 products

Explore the offering

Products & services

Separate profiles. Specific capabilities.

Open a product to explore its capabilities, delivery and sources, or browse its type to compare alternatives.

About IPQualityScore

IPQualityScore supplies fraud/risk intelligence for IP addresses and other digital identifiers. Its current Proxy Detection Database page explicitly identifies Casino & Gaming as a client industry and describes anonymous-network signals for geographic-control and abuse review. The reviewed IP database provides proxy/VPN/Tor classifications, network context and a supplier risk score.

Use these results as evidence within an operator policy, rather than treating a privacy network or high score as proof of fraud. Define the selected fields, update delivery, threshold calibration and review/fallback behaviour. IP-derived geography does not replace required physical-location or player-identity evidence. The supplier’s stated 3,500+ business footprint is across industries, distinct from daily events, database records and gambling adoption.

Where this supplier fits

Casino/operator risk teams using IP network evidence to review account, traffic and location anomalies.

Company-level capabilities

  • Proxy/VPN/Tor classifications
  • Residential/data-centre network context
  • IP reputation/risk score
  • On-premise database delivery
  • Adjustable settings and field scope

These reflect the supplier's public descriptions. Check individual products for scope; a company capability does not automatically apply to every offering.

Questions for your evaluation

Use these to confirm the details for your business and market.

  1. Which fields and refresh cadence are delivered?
  2. How are scores calibrated without blocking legitimate users unnecessarily?
  3. What identity/device/location evidence supplements an IP result?

Commercial-reach estimate

IPQualityScore popularity

85/100

An estimated index of documented commercial footprint and geographic reach. It is not market share, customer satisfaction or a product recommendation.

Medium evidence confidence80% of weighted inputs documentedChecked 8 Oct 2026
Commercial footprint 80% weight3,500+ businesses

Current homepage states 3,500+ businesses choose IPQS without a reporting date.

Scope: Supplier-wide business footprint across fraud/risk industries. This is not casino customers, daily events, data-sharing transactions or adoption of the reviewed database.

View source
Geographic reach 20% weightNot publicly confirmed

No numerical customer-linked country aggregate was established in the reviewed current official material.

Scope: Customer-linked geographic activity. Payment rails, document/data coverage, office locations, approvals and available markets are not inferred to be countries with customer operations.

View source

Source review confirms the recorded declaration, not an independent audit of every customer. Brands, customer groups and merchants are different units. Employee and follower counts do not affect this score.

Supplier-wide business footprint across fraud/risk industries. This is not casino customers, daily events, data-sharing transactions or adoption of the reviewed database. Missing inputs and undated reporting dates remain null. Workforce is context only.

Popularity methodology

Buyer questions, answered

Does the current product identify casino buyers?

Yes. Its Popular Client Industries section includes Casino & Gaming and discusses VPN evidence for geographic restrictions. It does not establish jurisdiction certification or a live operator connection.

Source
Which evidence fields are listed?

The database specification includes proxy/VPN/Tor status, hosting/network type, supplier fraud score, geographic details, recent abuse and ASN/organisation information. Agree the actual data package.

Source
Does a VPN flag prove the player is fraudulent?

No. The product describes network classifications and risk evidence, including privacy connections. The operator must calibrate settings, combine other evidence and define review/action rules.

Source