Finrax

Crypto payment processing with fiat conversion for eligible non-EU gaming businesses.

Popularity25%Estimated · low confidence
Explore 1 products

Explore the offering

Products & services

Separate profiles. Specific capabilities.

Open a product to explore its capabilities, delivery and sources, or browse its type to compare alternatives.

About Finrax

Finrax markets crypto payment processing explicitly for iGaming operators, including player deposits, withdrawals and business-partner payment flows. The current gaming page describes hosted checkout or API integration, fixed-rate quotes, fiat conversion and reporting. These are parts of one processing offer rather than separate products for every recipient, currency or settlement option.

Current availability needs particular attention: the footer says Finrax is not offering crypto-asset service provider services to EU customers while MiCA licensing is pending. Establish the eligible contracting entity and approved non-EU activity before committing to implementation. Agree quote validity, accepted assets, conversion, recipient controls, bank settlement and failed-transfer handling. Blockchain references and a fixed quote support reconciliation; they do not guarantee immediate bank receipt or unrestricted cross-border gambling.

Where this supplier fits

Eligible non-EU operator payment teams evaluating crypto funding, conversion and payout processing.

Company-level capabilities

  • Hosted checkout or API
  • Crypto-to-fiat conversion
  • Fixed-rate quote workflow
  • Player and business-partner flows
  • Reporting and reconciliation

These reflect the supplier's public descriptions. Check individual products for scope; a company capability does not automatically apply to every offering.

Questions for your evaluation

Use these to confirm the details for your business and market.

  1. Is our entity currently eligible for CASP services?
  2. Which assets, quote windows and fiat routes are enabled?
  3. How are chain confirmations, conversion and bank settlement represented?

Commercial-reach estimate

Finrax popularity

25/100

An estimated index of documented commercial footprint and geographic reach. It is not market share, customer satisfaction or a product recommendation.

Low evidence confidence0% of weighted inputs documentedChecked 8 Oct 2026
Commercial footprint 80% weightNot publicly confirmed

No numerical direct B2B customer aggregate was established in the reviewed current official material.

Scope: Direct supplier customer organisations. Consumer users, transactions, records, integrations, partner relationships and wider group totals are not converted into customers.

View source
Geographic reach 20% weightNot publicly confirmed

No numerical customer-linked country aggregate was established in the reviewed current official material.

Scope: Customer-linked geographic activity. Payment rails, document/data coverage, office locations, approvals and available markets are not inferred to be countries with customer operations.

View source

Source review confirms the recorded declaration, not an independent audit of every customer. Brands, customer groups and merchants are different units. Employee and follower counts do not affect this score.

Direct supplier commercial footprint only. Missing inputs and undated reporting dates remain null. Workforce is context only.

Popularity methodology

Buyer questions, answered

Does Finrax explicitly market an iGaming offer?

Yes. Its current page describes player deposits and payouts, business-partner deposits/payouts and reporting. These flows remain subject to onboarding and the selected contract.

Source
Are EU customers currently eligible for CASP services?

The current footer says Finrax is not offering CASP services to customers in the EU pending MiCA licensing. Obtain current eligibility confirmation for the actual entity before proceeding.

Source
Can we use a hosted payment flow?

The gaming page offers hosted checkout as well as direct API integration. Specify the supported assets, quote handling, result callbacks and reconciliation for the chosen approach.

Source