Fingerprint Device Intelligence Platform
Web/mobile device identification, risk signals and a configurable Suspect Score delivered to the operator’s own decision systems.
Supplier popularity85%Fingerprint
Device intelligence for multi-accounting, suspicious logins and transaction-risk assessment in iGaming.
Popularity85%Explore the offering
Products & services
Open a product to explore its capabilities, delivery and sources, or browse its type to compare alternatives.
About Fingerprint
Fingerprint supplies device intelligence for web and mobile applications. Its dedicated iGaming page addresses account takeover, bonus abuse, multi-accounting and risky transactions. The marketed platform combines a Visitor ID with browser, network and device signals, plus a configurable Suspect Score. Applications receive the evidence and decide how to act on it.
Place collection at the account events your team needs to assess, then connect the device evidence to the relevant player and transaction records. Test shared-device households, changed browsers and unfamiliar devices alongside abuse scenarios. Set rules for review or additional verification, including what happens when data is unavailable. Device association is one input to a decision; the account record and your operating policy supply the context.
Where this supplier fits
Operators and platform teams adding device evidence to account security and bonus-abuse controls.
Company-level capabilities
- Persistent browser/device identifiers
- Browser, network and device risk signals
- Configurable aggregate Suspect Score
- Web/mobile SDKs, APIs and webhooks
These reflect the supplier's public descriptions. Check individual products for scope; a company capability does not automatically apply to every offering.
Questions for your evaluation
Use these to confirm the details for your business and market.
- Which signals are included in the chosen plan and devices?
- How will a shared device be distinguished from abusive account creation?
- Where are rules enforced and exceptions reviewed?
Commercial-reach estimate
Fingerprint popularity
An estimated index of documented commercial footprint and geographic reach. It is not market share, customer satisfaction or a product recommendation.
Commercial footprint 80% weight6,000+ companies
The current homepage states trusted by 6000+ companies of all sizes.
Scope: All-vertical company footprint using the supplier’s technology; not a count of gambling operators. Devices, API events and open-source downloads are different units and are excluded.
View sourceGeographic reach 20% weightNot publicly confirmed
No aggregate of countries with customer operations was established in the reviewed current official material.
Scope: Customer-linked geographic activity. Supported countries, datasets, identity coverage, company offices and messaging channels are not converted to countries with customers.
View sourceSource review confirms the recorded declaration, not an independent audit of every customer. Brands, customer groups and merchants are different units. Employee and follower counts do not affect this score.
All-vertical company footprint using the supplier’s technology; not a count of gambling operators. Devices, API events and open-source downloads are different units and are excluded. Commercial and geographic evidence has no reporting date where undated. Missing inputs remain null; workforce is context only.
Popularity methodologyBuyer questions, answered
Which iGaming problems does Fingerprint address?
The dedicated industry page names multi-accounting, bonus and promo abuse, account takeover and risky transactions. The operator configures the response to the signals.
SourceDoes a Visitor ID verify the player’s legal identity?
The platform identifies the browser or mobile device and returns related risk signals. A legal-identity verification journey requires its own checks and account evidence.
SourceHow is usage priced?
The current pricing page bills by API requests and offers Free, Pro Plus and Enterprise scope. Web/iOS and Android allocations differ, so size the plan around the actual collection points.
Source