By Napier AI

Napier AI Transaction Monitoring

Rules and AI evidence connected to sandbox-tested transaction detection and analyst investigations.

The offering

What Napier AI Transaction Monitoring does

Transaction Monitoring evaluates activity with governed rules and AI-supported analysis, then connects alerts to cases and explanations. The current product describes a typology library, no-code rule authoring, automatic rule version history, sandbox testing and investigation context. Rule and AI scores can be compared as separate views of risk.

Supply consistent customer, transaction and history records, and define the actual gaming/payment scenarios to test. Evaluate alerts and missed-event cases on representative data before promoting changes. AI explanations support the investigator’s decision; they do not make a regulatory filing or player intervention automatic. Reporting and other Continuum components must be selected explicitly, and experimental capabilities are not assumed part of a production release.

Who should explore it?

Gambling AML teams validating transaction scenarios and reviewing explainable alerts.

  • Detect configured suspicious transaction patterns
  • Compare proposed rule changes before production approval

Documented capabilities

  • Governed detection rules
  • AI-supported activity analysis
  • Rule version history
  • Sandbox simulation/testing
  • Case and investigation context

Reported in the linked public sources. We have not independently tested these capabilities.

Product details

AML monitoring
Transaction-pattern detection and investigation evidence, distinct from name screening.Source
Detection design
Typology library and no-code rules combined with AI-supported risk views; configuration is governed and versioned.Source
Required records
Customer transaction history and selected behavioural/watchlist context must be mapped to the implementation.Source
Testing and cases
Sandbox testing before promotion, with case workflow, audit trail and human-controlled review.Source
Gaming use context
Current gambling material addresses online sports wagering and iGaming AML challenges; actual connected sources must be established.Source

Delivery & commercial details

Delivery & integration
Map customer/transaction history, configure scenarios and case permissions, validate rule/AI evidence in the sandbox and define production promotion and escalation.Source
Pricing
Obtain monitoring-volume, rules/models, deployment, data integration, cases, reporting and support terms for the actual solution scope.

Confirm market availability, rights, service levels and contractual terms for your implementation. API availability alone does not establish a named integration.

Buyer questions, answered

Can rules be changed without going straight into production?

The product describes building and testing scenarios in a sandbox with production behaviour or buyer datasets, with version history and controlled promotion.

Source
Does an AI explanation complete an investigation?

No. The product presents risk patterns and explanations within the analyst task, with human judgment in control. Define evidence review, escalation and any reporting steps separately.

Source